[Talk-us] OSM attribution on website store locator pages

Greg Morgan dr.kludge.gm at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 13:40:05 UTC 2016


On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:

> Interesting, a bit troubling, to see an increasing number of layers —
> abstraction — between the end user and the OSM data. Now it’s three — the
> web site itself, Mobify (never heard of them), Mapbox —  between the end
> user and OSM. Makes it easier for all the intermediaries to point to the
> others for attribution requirements. And harder for the OSM community to
> enforce this simple but important requirement. OSM can only benefit from
> having many eyes on the map if we can continue to close this feedback loop.
>
>


There is one more layer of abstraction: the design firm
http://www.magneticcreative.com/.  It seems that Magnetic Creative would
understand this issue.  They have their name in fine print at the bottom of
each page on the site.  Just as they want their name published for
potential clients, OpenStreetMap would like attribution for potential
future mappers.  I added their email to the list.  They would have to join
the list to respond, etc.  However, they should be able to pick up the
drift from this email chain.

Regards,
Greg







> To my mind it’s on Mapbox to enforce attribution, I assume having this
> present on the map is in the terms they present to their customers?
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Fred Hillhouse <f.hillhouse.jr at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Their tiles are coming from Mapbox. Who gets the attribution?
>
>
> http://b.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/dondeinc.i1021nhc/17/37433/50038.jpg70?access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoiZG9uZGVpbmMiLCJhIjoiZ200QzN4dyJ9.KIhMqSmPUSn9Kru51GZT4g
>
> Fred
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Harald Kliems [mailto:kliems at gmail.com <kliems at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:08 AM
> *To:* Hans De Kryger; Peter Dobratz
> *Cc:* talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-us] OSM attribution on website store locator pages
>
> Might make more sense to directly contact Mobify as the map provider. I
> have suspicion Pieology will have no clue what you're talking about and
> wouldn't be able to fix it themselves anyway. Contact for mobify:
> http://www.mobify.com/contact/
>
>  Harald.
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:10 AM Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I see nothing on the entire site linking/mentioning osm. their emails
> info at pieology.com if you want to contact them.
>
> *Regards,*
> *Hans*
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Peter Dobratz <peter at dobratz.us> wrote:
> I'm seeing OSM data used more and more for generating the basemap onto
> which things like store location data is displayed on store websites.
> However, it's not always easy to find links to OSM attribution on such maps.
>
> Has anyone seen this?
>
> http://locations.pieology.com/
>
> There's a link to http://www.mobify.com/ in the lower-left corner, but I
> can't seem to find any links to http://www.openstreetmap.org/ anywhere on
> the page.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20160414/289eb715/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list