[Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma

[OSM Volunteer stevea]

Thanks, Paul, that's a big task.  OSM (and I) appreciate it.

SteveA
California


> On Dec 5, 2016, at 4:00 AM, talk-us-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> 
> Send Talk-us mailing list submissions to
> 	talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	talk-us-request at openstreetmap.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	talk-us-owner at openstreetmap.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Talk-us digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. USBR 66 in Oklahoma (Paul Johnson)
> 
> From: Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>
> Subject: [Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma
> Date: December 5, 2016 at 3:20:34 AM PST
> To: OpenStreetMap talk-us list <talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
> 
> 
> Just a heads up, I'm noticing the relation for USBR 66 in Oklahoma is darn near unmaintainable due to the sheer size of it, and I'm taking action now to prevent the problem from getting far worse in the future.
> 
> The fact that the west end of the relation ends on a dual carriageway leading into Texas makes this relation extremely difficult to validate as a single relation.  This relation is presently over 1400 ways and is growing thanks to lane tagging efforts in the region.  As this relation has a huge number of dual and single carriageway segments, it's going to be easiest to split this into two relations by direction so at least editors can properly validate this relation.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us