[Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Thu Apr 27 21:54:06 UTC 2017


No problem, I've updated it and the adjacent frontage roads for how I
handle this situation typically (Texas turnarounds and 4-carriageway
freeway arrangements are common to frequent in my area).

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Horea Meleg <horea.meleg at telenav.com>
wrote:

> Hy Paul,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Can you give us an example of how exactly you’re
> approaching this, to understand better (some coordinates maybe).
>
> Also can you please tell us how you think our presented case, should be
> processed:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul Johnson [mailto:baloo at ursamundi.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:04 AM
> *To:* Horea Meleg <horea.meleg at telenav.com>
> *Cc:* Rihards <richlv at nakts.net>; Hans De Kryger <
> hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>; talk-US at openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Horea Meleg <horea.meleg at telenav.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hy guys, thanks for your responses.
> Do you think that is better to move motorway_junction where continuous
> line begins? In real life you can't cross a continuous line, so I think it
> should be the same in OSM. What do you think?
>
>
>
> Does anybody have objections on me updating that approach with my method?
> I tend to start a new lane where the lane taper finishes, start a split at
> the start of the theoretical gore (placement=transition on the exit), and
> start the ramp centerline at the bullnose.  For solid line situations, the
> US is a little weird on this.  A single solid white line is officially a
> "discouraged" movement one should make only with extreme caution, whereas
> crossing a double-white line is prohibited, as outlined in the MUTCD.  In
> either case, I would generally take the conservative approach in this
> situation, using something like change:lanes=yes|yes|yes|not_right|no
> where that solid line is.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20170427/cc89ddbe/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 63663 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20170427/cc89ddbe/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list