[Talk-us] Spartanburg County SC road centerlines import

[Mike N]

On 10/22/2018 8:46 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Could I suggest that you act cautiously wrt the tiger:reviewed tag in these
> two cases?
> 
> If it's an "unknown highway type" it should probably remain as
> tiger:reviewed=no. Likewise, if the surface isn't clear, then either
> tiger:reviewed should continue to be =no, or there should be some other
> tagging to indicate this (surface=unknown, or surface:reviewed=no, or
> something).

   As one who grew up in a rural area, a country road lined with 4 
houses in a mile would feel "residential" and I would tend to set it as 
residential in OSM.   That describes most of the rural parts of this 
county also, except for roads that don't happen to have a house.

   We could add Bing streetside to the workflow to confirm the surface 
type in most of the edge cases.