[Talk-us] Removal of sensitive data in East Bay Regional Park District, CA

[Kevin Broderick]

I agree, strongly, that we should remove the data in question. AllTrails in
particular has a history of [presumably] unintentionally directing people
towards sites that are supposed to only be open to tribal members and
invited guests, and I think this is a case where the unintended consequence
of mapping such sites are far more substantial than the benefit of having
them mapped.

On Wed, May 11, 2022, 19:56 Clay Smalley <claysmalley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:44 PM Ian Nicholson <ian at binaryash.net> wrote:
>
>> I don’t see any value to having such sensitive information documented,
>> and I the damage to sensitive sites is likely to be great. I propose that
>> the data be removed.
>>
>
> I concur with the reasons presented here, and in my opinion the data needs
> to be redacted. In general, it's important that tribal privileged knowledge
> remains within the tribes—otherwise, we are responsible for opening up
> people's sacred sites and traditions to vandalism and desecration.
>
> -Clay
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20220511/4ddacc4d/attachment.htm>