[OSM-talk] Being Constructive, was: Topology
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Tue Apr 24 13:54:54 BST 2007
J.D.,
> Also, all the code for everything regarding OSM is in SVN. People are
> able to put their actions where their mouths are.
Oh well, nice of you to say that, I've just implemented a new data
model in the server, would everyone please update their renderers,
editors, and other applications...
No, honestly: This much-iterated mantra works if you are making
small, incremental changes in relatively isolated areas. It works
best for individuals who sit down, close the door, don't communicate
at all, and the next morning, or the next weekend, come out with a
finished solution. It effectively cuts off, even ridicules, any
thinking about future technical development.
> But hey, we're all different. Some do things constructively, some
> do it
> destructively. I know which way gets the best results, so I'm sticking
> to that.
It is not fair of you to dismiss anyone who believes in some talking
*before* doing as not being constructive. (I've seen others in this
project do it as well, you're not alone.)
I must say that a considerable part of the fun I draw from hobby
programming is working together with others. This often takes the
form of first identifying a problem (by talking and observing, not
doing), then discussing about possible solutions (again, by talking
to others, making plans, etc., maybe programming a prototype) and
only in later stages actually churning out code.
In this project, it is very hard to find someone who's willing to
even think about a problem requiring an attention span of more than
five minutes and which cannot be simply fixed overnight.
In other words, the trivial stuff gets done and people boast about
their achievements; stuff that is too complex for one person to
tackle alone is left alone, and those who point out that something
might have to be done are ridiculed for not doing it themselves. This
project doesn't have a team, it has a ton of lone rangers. This
project is driven by the "lowest hanging fruit" principle - find
something that's easy to do, do it, and then tell the world that
you're a doer, not a talker. Yippieh. A real man.
I am beginning to carve out my personal niches, find people in the
project with whom I can cooperate on sub-projects and who don't laugh
at me if I bring ideas to the table that may not be ripe for months
to come. I play the game, by trying to isolate issues and work on
them. There is progress in that; all is not lost. But it would do us
all good to say goodbye to judging the vale of someone's contribution
in number of lines of code committed.
I'd rather have a few people who *only* talk and *never* code if what
they say is well thought out and leads to valuable discussion, than
have a bunch of hyperactive hackers turning every posting on the
mailing list into a new release overnight without having anything
like a "big picture".
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33'
More information about the talk
mailing list