[OSM-talk] Country Specific Route Markers
Tom Hughes
tom at compton.nu
Wed Aug 15 08:38:05 BST 2007
In message <200708151303330770.00D00991 at smtp.nsw.exemail.com.au>
Brent Easton <b.easton at exemail.com.au> wrote:
> Could someone post a brief summary of the the current state of play
> with country-specific route marking (i.e. showing the correct
> highway/state/tourist route shields) in both Mapnik and Osmarender?
We don't have good non-country specific route marking yet (at least
in mapnik - Osmarender is a bit better) so asking for country specific
might be leaping ahead a bit.
> We have developed a scheme to use in Australia to mark Australian
> routes using a ref:au= tag:
>
> ref:au=NR1 National Route - Highway 1 - (black on white shield)
> ref:au=NH31 National Highway - (yellow on green shield)
> ref:au=MR2 Metroad - (blue on white hexagon)
> ref:au=S151 State Route - (white on blue shield)
> ref:au=T5 Tourist Route - (white on brown Pentagon)
> ref:au=A1 A Roads (yellow on green rectangle)
> ref:au=B2 B Roads (yellow on green rectangle)
> ref:au=C3 C Roads (yellow on green rectangle)
> ref:au=M4 Motorways(yellow on green rectangle)
>
> Is this the correct way to go?
I would just use ref= for that. No other country is doing what you are
to the best of my knowledge.
> I notice Norway seems to be using
>
> ref:RV113
> is_in=Norway
>
> so using the standard ref= tag, but adding the is_in tag to allow
> later Norway specific processing.
An interesting idea. I wonder if it isn't better simply to use some
bounds based idea of determining what country something is in - no
idea how hard that would be though.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
More information about the talk
mailing list