[OSM-talk] Editing and tagging - Potlatch, or just JOSM?

[bvh]

Middle of the road : ask me to send you a binary of a recent
Merkaartor (windows or ubuntu available). Easy to set up and
easy to use for what you want to do : adding streets to an
already existing network)

cu bart

On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:39:55AM +0100, Bettersoftware wrote:
> Brent
> 
> I agree with you. JOSM IS worth the effort and I consider Potlash to be 
> almost useless when compared to it's predecessor. With it's very limited 
> facilities and features I just can't see why anyone would use it.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Barry
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brent Easton" <b.easton at exemail.com.au>
> To: "OSM Talk List" <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 6:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Editing and tagging - Potlatch, or just JOSM?
> 
> 
> > Gerald,
> >
> > Once I got JOSM running, the mere thought of using Potlatch to do anything 
> > causes me physical pain :)
> >
> > Make the effort to get it up running.
> >
> > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> >
> > On 17/08/2007 at 12:37 AM Gerald A  wrote:
> >
> >>I'm starting to fiddle around more seriously with OSM and am trying to use
> >>Potlatch to do so.
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Brent Easton
> > Analyst/Programmer
> > University of Western Sydney
> > Email: b.easton at uws.edu.au
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>