[OSM-talk] Exeter, UK Editing

[Ben Ward]

On Dec 5, 2007 3:58 PM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:

> (cc:ed to talk-gb, probably better discussed there)
> On a quick glance I haven't seen whether this is the case or not in
> Exeter, but pre-0.5, Potlatch didn't display "unwayed segments" by
> default. So you do sometimes get ways which were once unwayed segments
> coexisting with Potlatch-drawn ways. Whether this was the fault of
> Potlatch or of people leaving unwayed segments around is a moot point,
> I think. ;)
>

Probably guilty in my haste. :-) At least the unwayed segments thing isn't
going to happen now.



>
> I've quite often mapped junctions without getting traces for every
> constituent part - instead, just taken a few and noted the layout of
> the junction on paper. When there's a lot of detail involved it's
> usually best not to rely on GPS.
>

This is fair enough. I do this myself.  I'm not sure why I got the feeling
about these edits,  perhaps unfairly I trust potlatch edits less than JOSM
edits.


>
> FWIW after a very quick look at Exeter I can't immediately see
> anything untoward.
>

Except the junctions floating in space? :-)

Cheers
Ben

-- 
ben at crouchingbadger.com | http://crouchingbadger.com
51.717817,-1.225855
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20071205/c479d7a0/attachment.html>