[OSM-talk] New key, attraction= - use for museums, etc?
osm-list at deelkar.net
Thu Jul 26 15:27:56 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
frankie roberto schrieb:
>>> Whilst it might be unadvisable to add yet another key, 'attraction'
>>> seems to me to be a useful addition, that's not covered by any of the
>> I don't see any value of this!
>> Adding another topic without a real need, will just add more confusion
>> while adding new tags ...
I believe that virtually everything possibly covered by "attraction" can
be put under "tourism".
> It'd mostly be useful for adding new tags/features, as deciding
> between amenity, tourism or leisure is difficult and confusing (as
> evidenced by the numerous discussions on the wiki).
That's what the map features page on the wiki is for.
Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the talk