[OSM-talk] Tagging urban streets
Francisco R. Santos
frsantos at gmail.com
Mon Mar 5 15:30:39 GMT 2007
On 3/5/07, Robert Hart <Robert.Hart at burohappold.com> wrote:
> As with most English words, usage is pretty broad, and both terms could
> probably be applied to the majority of streets/roads.
> To me though, a "street" implies a linear entity with buildings arranged
> along it, normally houses, and normally on both sides.
> A "road" implies a linear entity that vehicles can pass along, normally
> including cars.
OK, it's a more general word than I thought. Sorry, for the
As far as OSM tagging is concerned the only difference is that
> highway=unclassified tends to become highway=residential for
> unclassified "streets".
So, the only difference between  and  is the tag "lanes=" ? Is this
small information sufficient for map rendering and/or navigation systems?
This distinction is slightly contentious, and
> there are some that would prefer the properties/classification of a road
> to be tagged independently of its usage.
On 3/5/07, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> In short: if you don't have any evidence that it's a classified road, use
highway=tertiary (for the biggest streets), highway=unclassified (for
everything else), or highway=pedestrian (for pedestrianised road).
mmm, only big streets or everything else. I miss some urban classification
the way "highway" does: for example, urban=primary, urban=secondary,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk