[OSM-talk] Tagging of areas with holes

[80n]

On 10/30/07, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>
> Hi 80n,
>
> >    Nothing has yet been implemented for Osmarender AFAIK.
>
> I'm pretty sure you implemented "multipolygon" support yourself, by
> simply treating all ways inside a multipolygon relationship as if they
> were disjunct parts of the same way, and thus exactly replicating the
> old behaviour!


I cut some code, yes, but don't remember if I got it working - I seem to
think there were bugs or something...


Or was that someone else?
>
> This means that while it is true that we'd meanwhile like relation
> members to be tagged "outer" and "inner", for them to look right in
> Osmarender you should (also) make sure that (like in olden times) the
> outer ring runs in a different direction than the inner ring(s).
>
> David Stubbs:
> > Do the individual ways need to be tagged as landuse=forest; or is it
> > the multipolygon relationship which needs to be tagged as
> > landuse=forest; or do the individual ways and the multipolygon
> > relationship need to be tagged as landuse = forest?
>
> In the long run it would make sense to tag (only) the relation I
> think, but we're not there yet; currently you need to tag the ways
> (only).


We have to agree on whether tags on relations override tags on ways, or vice
versa.


Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00.09' E008°23.33'
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20071030/8e16a832/attachment.html>