[OSM-talk] Highways with highway=steps

[Peter Miller]

Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:10:41 +0200 (CEST)

From: "Karl Eichwalder" <ke at gnu.franken.de>

Subject: [OSM-talk] Highways with highway=steps

To: talk at openstreetmap.org

Message-ID: <51095.83.171.180.64.1190956241.squirrel at www.franken.de>

Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

 

> Could someone with svn access add highways tagged surface=unpaved to

> the mapnik and osmarender rules files, so that they render like

> highways tagged highway=unsurfaced (which are rendered in mapnik but

> not osmarender). Surface=unpaved is listed in map features, but

> highway=unsurfaced is not (I presume that it is depreciated). In

> osmarender, I would suggest rendering unpaved highways like

> unclassified but with dashed borders.

> 

> Also, could someone add highway=secondary_link to osmarender? It isn't

> actually in map features, but it is widely used, and mapnik renders

> it. It should be rendered like highway=secondary.

 

+1

 

Thanks, these all are sensible proposals.  I'd like to ask to render

highway=steps in mapnik.  Starting with level 2 or 3 rendering should

be equal with highway=footway.

 

+1

 

 

Can you also get maplint to accept:-

ncn=yes

amenity=bicycle_parking

highway=secondary 'with' roundabout=true ; the combination seems to fail

cycleway=track / lane / opposite_track / opposite_lane  ; I think some of
these tags are already accepted, but not all

 

Can osmarender render:

mini-rounabouts only at the same zoom levels that traffic signals are
rendered (either bring traffic_signals out one, or mini-roundabout in one)

crossing=toucan/pelican/zebra ; the list can grow, but this is a good start
(at the same level as traffic_signals)

amenity=toilet ; same level as zebras etc.

 

I think all of the above should be demonstratable / testable here:

http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.05525503346746
<http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.05525503346746&lon=1.149540679005921&
zoom=16&layers=0B00T000> &lon=1.149540679005921&zoom=16&layers=0B00T000

 

(Personally I would like osmarender becoming more pedestrian focused as one
gets more zoomed in with pedestrian/cyclist features getting more attention
and main roads getting less prominence). Alternatively we need a new
rendering style for pedestrians (which of course only needs to be available
for high zoom levels).

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Peter

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070928/0fa3064c/attachment.html>