[OSM-talk] revert changesets??

[Apollinaris Schoell]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com> wrote:

> Hi Apollinaris
>
> Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>
>> should be deleted then.
>>
> Why?
>
> We map what is on ground ( with some exceptions like boundaries)


>  Burning man follows a no trace policy.
>>
> Who says this & why?


Burning man policy


>
>  as alternative it must be at least tagged different to disappear from
>> maps.
>>
> Why?
>
>
> because it's not on ground. if there is no highway then don't tag a highway


> As I was considering doing a similar thing for Glastonbury, I was wondering
> what the consensus on mapping temporary (but regular) structures?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glastonbury_Festival
>
>
there is no structure left behind for burning men. as soon as all is removed
map should show current status again.
keeping it in the database is ok but the tags need to reflect that there is
nothing left on ground



>
> Cheers
> Dave F.
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20091217/d8f321f5/attachment.html>