[OSM-talk] License plan - better on legal@
peter.miller at itoworld.com
Fri Feb 27 16:49:33 GMT 2009
>> This announce as been made, I'd perfer you to continue talking
>> about it on
> The legal details can be discussed on legal. But the matter of
> or rather not informing the people concerned by this fits right here.
I think that makes a lot of sense. I really want to focus on the legal
details of the licence on legal-talk to make sure that it works and is
fair. It is also important for people on talk and on regional lists to
make sure they are happy with the licence and then organise themselves
contact all the top contributors in their areas and get them on side.
However .... if discussions of legal interpretation arise, such as
'who's way is it' or 'what does this phrase mean' then this is
probably better handled on legal-talk, although we are likely to just
register it as a question to be answered by the legal people and shove
it on the wiki until we get an answer from them!
Currently we still seem to have some big unknowns, but I am working on
the parts of the jigsaw that I currently have access to (ie the ODbL
licence itself and the factual licence).
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk