[OSM-talk] keep right! and landuse=wood
Gustav Foseid
gustavf at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 15:09:49 BST 2009
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net> wrote:
> Of course, determining whether your average bit of woodland in the UK is
> landuse or natural is fun, given that pretty much all of it has been
> carefully managed at soem stage over the past few hundred years! Why do we
> care if it's mananged, and if it's a forest or wood? Knowing that would
> help guide which tags to use, otherwise I'm tempted to just mark everything
> as natural=wood and be done with it!
>
In my mind, something like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cricketbatwillow/825730972/
is "managed forest" and landuse=forest
But something like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sequella/425687849/in/photostream/
is mostly unmanaged and natural=wood.
At least, that has been my interpretation of the wiki.
- Gustav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090720/448a2b49/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list