[OSM-talk] Wiki page for big data contributors needs updating
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Sat Mar 14 09:52:00 GMT 2009
Hi,
Simone Cortesi wrote:
> The problem I see is that I asked the various administrations for
> derivation rights under CC-BY-SA licence.
>
> Clearly I do not want to go back and ask them again for agreement
> under a new licence.
If the authorisation they have given you is reasonably wide-ranging (as
in "your data is public anyway, feel free to import") then by all means
leave it in. If it has been given to you under CC-BY-SA and you cannot
be bothered to talk to them, then compile a list of people that have to
be contacted and ask someone else from the Italian community to take
over. If they say no, or cannot be contacted, then the data has to be
removed.
I think that if your contribution was significant, e.g. the conversion
work was non-trivial and a kind of creative act, then you have a say -
this means you could say "no I will not relicense" even if the original
government source says "fine with me", but not the other way round (you
cannot say "sure I'll relicense" when they say no...)
BTW has anyone talked to the TIGER import people yet? Someone recently
argued on the lists that the TIGER import was quite complex with all
that un-braiding and so on, and that the TIGER data in our database
could not be considered PD because the import process was a creative
work in its own right. If this is true, then that would mean that those
who did the import could now "just say no" and we'd then lose TIGER and
everything that was since built on the import. I'd hazard the guess that
this makes those who did the TIGER import some of the most powerful
people in OSM at the moment ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list