[OSM-talk] Flickr Now Supports OSM Tags
osm.list at randomjunk.co.uk
Thu Oct 1 09:49:51 BST 2009
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <aschoell at gmail.com>
>> On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
>> > No, he is a leader because we respect him. THAT is how leaders in
>> > an anarchic state arise.
>> yes he is a leader and as such deserves respect. he should lead some
>> useful and intelligent projects and don't loose a word about this
>> childish 1/0/yes/no/true/false discussions.
>> a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small
>> fee for free access to an amazing database.
> The discussion is only childish if the tone of the discussion is childish.
> But if people discuss this issue in a good manner, then it isn't childish.
> If we can remove that small fee, why not do it?
> What's so hard about standardizing on the boolean values given appropriate
> changes to editor presets, good wiki documentation, and a deprecation period
> for other boolean values?
what's so hard?
The hard part is figuring out what the hell any of this actually has
to do with the thread topic.
Amazingly tag-standardisation is not even /relevant/ to the original
problem pointed out.
Oh well... wouldn't be the internet if someone wasn't wrong on it.
More information about the talk