[OSM-talk] Thoughts on OSM design, and looking forward and back
deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 00:01:59 GMT 2010
On 24 February 2010 09:42, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
> You don't seem to make any realistic suggestions for moving forward and just, instead, suggest potlatch is fine as is the front page. That doesn't seem to be in touch with the reality of every newbie who encounters the project, does it?
Have you asked for any estimates on getting a replacement for potlatch coded?
I already saw how you'd rather not go down this path, but I'm curious
because I agree 100% that we need something similar after having spend
considerable time explaining potlatch to non-tech relatives...
More information about the talk