[OSM-talk] Help! Changeset reverted without explanation

[Nathan Edgars II]

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <aschoell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 27 Feb 2010, at 14:33 , Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> And a week from now half the ways in the changeset will probably have
>> been edited, making a restoration very complicated. Is it the intent
>> here that those with the technical know-how to revert can make a
>> "first strike", leaving others unable to act?
>
> but if the first strike can also leave others unable to act. If there is no obvious wrong doing you need to provide more and better explanations why your edits are good and the revert is bad.
> for me it's not clear without spending a lot of time comparing your edits with previous versions. explain what you did and why and it's more likely someone is willing to do it.

I fail to see how reverting with no explanation and then not
responding when asked is not "obvious wrong doing". As for what I did,
I explained in a previous post - I fixed up the routings of the
numbered highways.