[OSM-talk] New site about the license change

[Elizabeth Dodd]

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:17:00 -0500
Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com> wrote:

> The other reason this is complicated, though, is that OSM started with
> a faulty process of not requiring copyright assignment, which meant
> that every contributor had to be handled separately. That's being
> fixed now with the new CT.

Could you please expand on your statement that the process was "faulty"?