[OSM-talk] Zero tolerance on imports
Andrew Errington
a.errington at lancaster.ac.uk
Sun Feb 20 01:48:33 GMT 2011
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:16:10 Mike N wrote:
> On 2/19/2011 8:04 PM, Andrew Errington wrote:
>
> Imports aren't always bad. Consider the equivalent case of one or
> more mappers who worked heavily in your area 2 years ago. You might
> discover errors and lack of new roads and come to the same conclusion.
That case is not equivalent because it's hypothetical. My observation is
actual.
Anyway, I like the idea of using imports as a 'scaffold' for building real
objects. Imported data could sit on a separate layer, much like GPS traces,
then a mapper can either trace over the imported shapes, or select an
imported object and 'promote' it to become a real object (then join it up to
existing objects), or select an imported object and delete it, either because
it already exists, or it's wrong, or it has served its purpose for tracing.
Over time the import layer will fade away once all of its objects have been
scrutinised.
Best wishes,
Andrew
More information about the talk
mailing list