[OSM-talk] old planet files with 'nolt' in the name
Martijn van Exel
m at rtijn.org
Sat Jan 14 19:38:32 GMT 2012
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 01/14/2012 07:10 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>>
>> 1) There's no planet files for Jan 09.
>
>
> I can give you one. I have them archived in pbf format, two for each date -
> one with all the US data and one with all the non-US data. Do you need both
> halves?
I downloaded the 081231 one which seems OK (I only did a osmosis
--migrate and --bp operation on it and that went through).
> (I also have a working version of the 100106 planet.)
I'm downloading the 100113 planet now, I'll try that first.
Thanks for the offers though - I may take you up on one later.
> But you should really be using the full history file - fraction of the
> download size and you have it all in there!
I know, they're just harder to work with for me. I have some code
based on imposm.parser which does not seem to want to parse .osh.pbf
files.
osmjs seems the way to go for me for working with full history files
(I can't code C++) but I'd have to rewrite that python code (and the
accompanying unit tests).
Will probably try both. I love that the history files are available
and I'd much prefer using them, also because it allows for much deeper
inspection into the user contribution dynamics than the snapshots.
>
>> 2) The planet files around that time have 'nolt' in their names. Are
>> they special in some way?
>
>
> A large copyright violation in Lithuania that we needed to revert later;
> these planet files are lacking *all* of Lithuania.
>
Thanks for confirming that.
--
martijn van exel
geospatial omnivore
1109 1st ave #2
salt lake city, ut 84103
801-550-5815
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
More information about the talk
mailing list