[OSM-talk] OSM cycle map - ?excessive focus on long-distance routes

[Richard Mann]

You'd have to ask the City of Utrecht whether their "main cycle routes" are
signed. If they've officially identified a particular set of routes, that
would seem to be fairly clear-cut. See their city website:
http://www.utrecht.nl/images/dso/infraprojecten/fiets/fietsroutes.html

Richard



On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>wrote:

> Richard Mann wrote:
> > My point is that tagging should allow both types of routes to be
> > recorded
>
> We tag what's on the ground, whether it's route signage, cycle-specific
> infrastructure, or a giant woolly mammoth (http://url.ie/f9ts).
>
> Are you suggesting a deviation from that?
>
> cheers
> Richard
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-cycle-map-excessive-focus-on-long-distance-routes-tp5697183p5697391.html
> Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120509/5b177531/attachment.html>