[OSM-talk] Key Proposal wheelchair:toilet

Henning Scholland osm at aighes.de
Sat Jun 8 09:43:27 UTC 2013

Maybe it is supported by a special wheelchair-editor?

In general I think the meanings of both tagings are different.

amenity=toilets => there is a single toilet

wheelchair:toilet=yes => there is another amenity, shop, whatever, which 
offers a toilet.


Am 08.06.2013 02:14, schrieb Andrew Errington:
> On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:26:26 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> the suggestion for a toilet attribute on a POI according to
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets  is "toilets",
>> that's why I suggest you change the wording in your proposal to plural.
>> IMHO the most logical way would be toilets:wheelchair=yes/no but
>> wheelchair:toilets is currently used far more often.
> Yes!  I don't understand why people ignore the wiki.
> Tagging is already defined for amenity=toilet (wheelchair=yes/no/limited), why
> not use that?
> wheelchair:toilets is not even documented, so why is it used more often?
> Best wishes,
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- n?chster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130608/b4d00fd7/attachment.html>

More information about the talk mailing list