[OSM-talk] Fwd: A short online questionnaire on the OSM users .....(It takes 48 seconds)

Kai Krueger kakrueger at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 16:31:33 UTC 2013

Clifford Snow wrote
> Your survey is mostly demographics. There were two actual questions
> related
> to mapping. I'm not sure what you hope to achieve.

Understanding the demographics of the mapping community can be a very
interesting question and topic of research.

After all, there has just been set up a new mailing list "diversity-talk",
to discuss the demographics of openstreetmap and how to achieve a broad
appeal to many different demographic groups. Having some good hard numbers
about the current situation, to augment the data we already have, would be
rather helpful.

If good methods can be worked out how to achieve those numbers, these
studies can be repeated periodically. That can then be helpful, amongst
other things, to see if various outreach programs to try and diversify the
community have had success, and if yes in which demographics.

Understanding the motivation of mappers can also be hugely interesting! This
information can help figure out how best to promote OSM and get more people
involved in mapping and where best to focus efforts to attract more people.

Clifford Snow wrote
> Please rethink this survey and try again.

Without knowing the questions this research is trying to answer and what
other tools and data they are using as well as their analysis method, you
cannot judge if it is a good survey and appropriately set up for the
questions it hopes to address. Furthermore, good research in social sciences
is often incredibly difficult. As you usually have no interventional control
on the subject of study and you often have to deal with subjective reports
in surveys. So it is often not uncommon to have to ask many seemingly
redundant and strange questions in order to get around or detect biases.

Clifford Snow wrote
> As Frederik Ramm suggest, please
> explain more about your research.

I would be very interested in hearing more about the research as well.
However, there are situations when you don't want to reveal the actual
questions you are interested in ahead of time to your survey participants as
alone the knowledge of what the researcher is interested can bias the
results. With the relatively factual questions of this survey that seems
less likely though.. 

Overall, I think there is more than enough room for a lot of different
research, both social and gis research in the OSM community and its data.
Imho it is great to see research into these topics and the more the better! 

View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Fwd-A-short-online-questionnaire-on-the-OSM-users-It-takes-48-seconds-tp5767270p5767309.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the talk mailing list