[OSM-talk] Looking for example of well mapped rural area and properly mapped city
andreas.vilen at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 16:13:44 UTC 2015
You have already included "my" mapping area as a well mapped rural area so
I'll recommend my home town as a well mapped city:
The entire municipality should be pretty much completely mapped:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>
> I am looking for well mapped rural area.
> I am working on a new version of roads for Default style. I want to
> avoid strong bias toward cities and ignoring rural area but at this
> moment I am lacking test places to see how well potential style works.
> Places that are not fully mapped are OK but I am not interested in
> places that are badly mapped (especially: [highway=track] instead of
> [highway=residential; surface=unpaved], residential/unclassified used
> Also - it is less important, but is anybody aware about city where
> - landuse is mapped
> - highway=residential/unclassified/track is used correctly both in city
> and nearby area
> - buildings and roads are mapped
> In other words - is there a perfectly mapped town/city?
> Currently for rural areas I have only
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/53.2134/-1.7983 (rural UK)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/55.4102/13.4749 (area between
> Malmo and Ystad)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.87433/16.77617 (Czech
> (Czech republic)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.93190/7.08075 (Netherlands)
> All places suffer from missing important features (for example landuse)
> and/or poor mapping, especially of landuses. And it is the best of what
> I found.
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk