[OSM-talk] Abandoned buildings

[John Doe]

In my opinion objects with abandoned prefix should be introduced in
nominatim for searches and in mapnik to see them (with a different render
obviously).
OSM can be an important database also for stats about abandoned
buildings/houses in our cities.
Some organization (also the public administration) can be interested in
research and exploitation of these places and OSM can be a great base.
Il 05/Gen/2016 13:29, "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoniecz at gmail.com> ha scritto:

> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:14:25 +0100
> John Doe <theguestone at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with
> > abandoned:building=yes (as wiki) and the building name but now i can't
> > search these ones with nominatim (no results) and none of these
> > appears on mapnik.
> > Is prefix abandoned before building=yes really correct?
>
> "I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with
> abandoned:building=yes"
>
> I think it is mistake. abandoned: prefix makes sense for things like
> shops where there is a fundamental difference between active shop (POI
> - it is possible to buy something there or provides some services).
>
> abandoned:shop, abandoned:amenity is solely an orientation point.
>
> In case of buildings there is no such fundamental difference between
> used and unused one.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160105/f4ba0b4f/attachment.html>