[OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 12:04, Tomas Straupis <tomasstraupis at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
>  My main point is to get back to reservoir/basin being tagged as "landuse"


why would that be desirable? Basically landuse is a property of land, and generally it's not very clear how to apply (it depends on the scale, and our db doesn't have a scale). As opposed to this, mapping a reservoir or a basin as a feature is much clearer, you don't have to worry whether you include auxiliary stuff like the service road leading to the reservoir, or the non-water-storage but legally associated areas around it to the feature (you won't).

cheers,
Martin