[OSM-talk] Is this legal to what philly.com is doing?

[James]

specifically:
http://philly.reprintmint.com/006-default.html?src=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.philly.com%2Fimages%2F250*250%2Fdixon-390888-f-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map-1200x800.png&verification=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.philly.com%2Fimages%2Fdixon-390888-f-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map-1200x800.png&source=006&title=dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map&caption=The%20new%20congressional%20map%20released%20Monday%20by%20the%20Pennsylvania%20Supreme%20Court
.

On Feb 22, 2018 11:06 PM, "James Mast" <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/will-republicans-impeach-
> pennsylvania-supreme-court-justices-20180222.html
>
> (ignore what the article is about)
>
>
> Just happen to see a thumbnail and clicked on the article since I noticed
> the OSM base map.  Nowhere that I can find does it give credit to OSM for
> the use of it.
>
>
> Now, the part to where I was curious if this was legal (sans the lack of
> credit), is that they are 'selling' the uploaded image.  Is that allowed
> currently under the license that OSM has?
>
>
> Just thought I'd throw this out there for somebody more experienced in
> this sector.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20180223/95179c84/attachment.html>