[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #450 2019-02-26-2019-03-04
joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Mon Mar 11 22:05:25 UTC 2019
I didn’t add my opinion because it seemed clear that most people thought
that non-attribution is a problem.
Let the record show that I also strongly support requiring attribution, so
that more people will become aware of OSM and perhaps start to improve the
data in their area.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:59 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> You write: "Issues with attributing OSM when using our data are nearly as
> old as our project. Richard Fairhurst addresses
> the issue of non-compliant attributions in a comprehensive post on the
> mailing list. Based on the responses it appears that the issue is not that
> important for other mappers or they are resigned to current practices."
> How did you come to this conclusion? I counted 3 people not so interested
> in attribution or OK with current state of things and 16 agreeing either
> explicitly or implicitly with Richard's assessment that there is a problem.
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk