[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #450 2019-02-26-2019-03-04

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Mon Mar 11 22:05:25 UTC 2019


I didn’t add my opinion because it seemed clear that most people thought
that non-attribution is a problem.

Let the record show that I also strongly support requiring attribution, so
that more people will become aware of OSM and perhaps start to improve the
data in their area.

-Joseph Eisenberg

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:59 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

> You write: "Issues with attributing OSM when using our data are nearly as
> old as our project. Richard Fairhurst addresses
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-February/082136.html>
> the issue of non-compliant attributions in a comprehensive post on the
> mailing list. Based on the responses it appears that the issue is not that
> important for other mappers or they are resigned to current practices."
>
> How did you come to this conclusion? I counted 3 people not so interested
> in attribution or OK with current state of things and 16 agreeing either
> explicitly or implicitly with Richard's assessment that there is a problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190312/b887d820/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list