[OSM-talk] Fwd: Fix maritime borders of Ceuta and Melilla (Spain)
Andy Townsend
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 21:21:24 UTC 2021
(picking this up again because it's gone quiet)
On 26/01/2021 09:01, Alejandro Moreno wrote:
>
> Whoever disagrees with the maritime border should be the one to
> justify it since, unless proven otherwise, every territory with a
> coastline has territorial waters. From United Nations Convention on
> the Law of the Sea (
> https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
> <https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf>
> page 27 ) "The sovereignty of a coastal State extends, beyond its land
> territoryand internal waters and, in the case of an archipelagic
> State, its archipelagicwaters, to an adjacent belt of sea, described
> as the territorial sea."
>
I can certainly see the logic here - it seems particularly unlikely that
crossing either of the bridges at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/35.88971/-5.31749 , someone would
need to get their passport out twice. What isn't clear is _how much_
water is claimed and (more important for OSM) how much is actually
controlled.
> As a source, http://www.seaaroundus.org/data/#/eez
> <http://www.seaaroundus.org/data/#/eez> can be used to see the
> territorial waters of Ceuta and Melilla that is equal to EEZ. For me
> is difficult to find any other source of maritime border.
I've not found a suitable source either - that's why I hoped that
posting here would help!
What is clear is that the http://www.seaaroundus.org/data/#/eez isn't
much use for a couple of reasons. One is that EEZ != territorial
waters; the seaaroundus map makes that fairly obvious, as does
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_economic_zone . Also, the
seaaroundus is a not-very detailed vector map. It suggests some sort of
EEZ for Melilla, but around Ceuta the suggested EEZ makes no sense at
all - it suggests Moroccan EEZ north and south but Spanish EEZ due east.
> Missing in all this is the position of Morocco - can anyone point
> to a
> statement there?
>
Unfortunately https://openstreetmap.community/ doesn't suggest anywhere
obvious. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-africa gets some
traffic but most of the messages don't seem to be local-community
based. I'll try there, but other suggestions would be welcome.
Best Regards,
Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20210202/dc568d43/attachment.htm>
More information about the talk
mailing list