[OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 3 Sep 2022, at 19:02, Tomas Straupis <tomasstraupis at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Anybody
> doing a proper process of adding service classification will need some
> value to distinguish checked objects from unchecked ones.
>  Therefore removing it will be removing work.


+1


> If "2" is causing
> trouble here, value could be changed to say "other".


basically every service=* value we have established so far gives a reason why it is an “inferior” kind of highway compared to a “regular” service. “Other” does not fit well in this system, and it also breaks when we introduce new service values, as nobody will know whether they are contained in “other” or not.

Cheers Martin