[GraphHopper] Bicycle navigation on separate cycleways

[Marc Gemis]

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <graphhopper at gmx.de> wrote:

>  Hi Marc,
>
> off-the-list you have posted this example:
>
> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk
>
> > As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as separate lines
>
> That is a tough problem.
>
> If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the main street
> you should map it as one or more connecting streets. If there is a free and
> accessible area between the cycleway and the main street and this area can
> be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should map it as such. Although we
> currently do not support area routing, it should not be that hard to add:
> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82
>

It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but it is not the same. This
weekend I'l see a number of Belgian mappers. I'll try to discuss it there
as well.


>
>
>  > Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would
> be nice that the name of the street would taken.
> > The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the street-relation
> to bring all parts together.
>
> Do you have a link to that schema?
>

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap
(in German)

regards

m
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20141209/585a2c6e/attachment.html>