[GraphHopper] Bicycle navigation on separate cycleways

[Marc Gemis]

BTW, it seems like there is some interest in this topic on the German
mailing list as well, under the title "cycleway=track bei Bordstein
Trennung" [1]
it is more general than what I was asking for.

regards

m

[1]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <graphhopper at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Marc,
>>
>> off-the-list you have posted this example:
>>
>> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk
>>
>> > As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as separate
>> lines
>>
>> That is a tough problem.
>>
>> If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the main street
>> you should map it as one or more connecting streets. If there is a free and
>> accessible area between the cycleway and the main street and this area can
>> be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should map it as such. Although we
>> currently do not support area routing, it should not be that hard to add:
>> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82
>>
>
> It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but it is not the same. This
> weekend I'l see a number of Belgian mappers. I'll try to discuss it there
> as well.
>
>
>>
>>
>>  > Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would
>> be nice that the name of the street would taken.
>> > The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the
>> street-relation to bring all parts together.
>>
>> Do you have a link to that schema?
>>
>
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap
> (in German)
>
> regards
>
> m
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20141209/b60fbb1b/attachment.html>