[GraphHopper] Bicycle navigation on separate cycleways
Peter
graphhopper at gmx.de
Tue Dec 9 12:42:58 UTC 2014
Hi Marc,
off-the-list you have posted this example:
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk
> As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as separate lines
That is a tough problem.
If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the main street
you should map it as one or more connecting streets. If there is a free
and accessible area between the cycleway and the main street and this
area can be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should map it as such.
Although we currently do not support area routing, it should not be that
hard to add: https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82
> Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would
be nice that the name of the street would taken.
> The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the
street-relation to bring all parts together.
Do you have a link to that schema?
Regards,
Peter
On 07.12.2014 08:10, Marc Gemis wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I was wondering how one can improve the mapping in case of cycleways
> that run parallel to the main road. Those cycleways were originally
> tagged as cycleway=track on the main road. As we add more detail to
> OSM, people start to draw them as separate lines. There is no
> indication whether it is possible to cross the (main) road at all
> times. This is the case when the cycleway is just on the kerb, without
> physical barrier, such as an hedge or ditch.
>
> Are there ideas to tackle this problem ? A tag "street_can_be_crossed"
> on the cycleway ?
>
> Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would
> be nice that the name of the street would taken. The might be solved
> with the Lübeck scheme that uses the street-relation to bring all
> parts together.
>
> regards
>
> m
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GraphHopper mailing list
> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20141209/5affc170/attachment.html>
More information about the GraphHopper
mailing list