[GraphHopper] Bicycle navigation on separate cycleways

Peter graphhopper at gmx.de
Tue Dec 9 15:02:02 UTC 2014


Thanks for the links!

This is really complex matter when I think more about it. As the street
itself could be too dangerous to pass or with a fence to avoid
(bike/pedestrian) crossing

Peter


On 09.12.2014 15:51, Marc Gemis wrote:
> BTW, it seems like there is some interest in this topic on the German
> mailing list as well, under the title "cycleway=track bei Bordstein
> Trennung" [1]
> it is more general than what I was asking for.
>
> regards
>
> m
>
> [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com
> <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <graphhopper at gmx.de
>     <mailto:graphhopper at gmx.de>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Marc,
>
>         off-the-list you have posted this example:
>         https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk
>
>         > As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as
>         separate lines
>
>         That is a tough problem.
>
>         If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the
>         main street you should map it as one or more connecting
>         streets. If there is a free and accessible area between the
>         cycleway and the main street and this area can be crossed by
>         bike or (only) foot you should map it as such. Although we
>         currently do not support area routing, it should not be that
>         hard to add: https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82
>
>
>     It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but it is not the
>     same. This weekend I'l see a number of Belgian mappers. I'll try
>     to discuss it there as well.
>      
>
>
>
>         > Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would be nice that the name
>         of the street would taken.
>         > The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the
>         street-relation to bring all parts together.
>
>         Do you have a link to that schema?
>
>
>     http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap
>     (in German)
>      
>     regards
>
>     m
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GraphHopper mailing list
> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20141209/54f42e84/attachment.html>


More information about the GraphHopper mailing list