[GraphHopper] Bicycle navigation on separate cycleways

[Marc Gemis]

The cases I'm thinking about are like number 6 on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Radverkehrsanlagen
So it might be best to keep them as cycleway=track on the main street in
those cases.


regards

m

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Peter <graphhopper at gmx.de> wrote:

>  Thanks for the links!
>
> This is really complex matter when I think more about it. As the street
> itself could be too dangerous to pass or with a fence to avoid
> (bike/pedestrian) crossing
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On 09.12.2014 15:51, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> BTW, it seems like there is some interest in this topic on the German
> mailing list as well, under the title "cycleway=track bei Bordstein
> Trennung" [1]
> it is more general than what I was asking for.
>
>  regards
>
>  m
>
>  [1]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <graphhopper at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Marc,
>>>
>>> off-the-list you have posted this example:
>>>
>>> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk
>>>
>>> > As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as separate
>>> lines
>>>
>>>  That is a tough problem.
>>>
>>> If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the main street
>>> you should map it as one or more connecting streets. If there is a free and
>>> accessible area between the cycleway and the main street and this area can
>>> be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should map it as such. Although we
>>> currently do not support area routing, it should not be that hard to add:
>>> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82
>>>
>>
>>  It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but it is not the same.
>> This weekend I'l see a number of Belgian mappers. I'll try to discuss it
>> there as well.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  > Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would
>>> be nice that the name of the street would taken.
>>> > The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the
>>> street-relation to bring all parts together.
>>>
>>>  Do you have a link to that schema?
>>>
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap
>> (in German)
>>
>> regards
>>
>>  m
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GraphHopper mailing listGraphHopper at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GraphHopper mailing list
> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20141209/707dca6e/attachment.html>