[Imports] Sitka, AK Buildings Import
joshuahouston at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 07:47:40 UTC 2016
I see, that makes sense. Okay, I will go through and return the amenity
tags I had on buildings. I'll wait till I know the hospital campuses,
school campuses, etc. to make the amenity tag part of a campus way instead
of a building way.
Thanks and cheers,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> sent from a phone
> > On 20 Dec 2016, at 20:06, Joshua Houston <joshuahouston at gmail.com>
> > And though I understand this concern, I feel it is getting away from the
> imports topic and more into tagging critiques
> tagging is one of the crucial points with imports, because one mapper (the
> importer) has a big lever and is potentially able to skew/actually always
> skewing usage statistics. It is very important which tags are chosen and
> merits raised attention when you tag lots of objects rather than very few.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports