[Osmf-talk] Handling OSMF finances going forward

Johan & Marguerite textline at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 22:02:31 UTC 2014

The FOSSGIS example is one which unfortunately does not show proper
segregation of duties. I would be happy to advise the new board on
governance (both financial and non-financial), since I have a background in
accountancy & controlling. If there are other osmf members with
professional experience in accountancy & controlling, let me know.

Cheers, Johan

2014-10-30 21:11 GMT+01:00 Peter Barth <osm at won2.de>:

> Hi,
> Kevin.Arruda at elektrobit.com schrieb:
> > I don't believe even redundant Treasurers is enough to address the
> laundry list of concerns and potential issues raised in the thread. Also,
> there seems to be a general theme that ultimately relates to trust and
> reliability of person(s)
> I didn't see a statement about trust or reliability or some
> other (personal) allegation. It's been about transparency from
> the begining on (in the other threads, too, btw) and I think
> Frederik explained just that very well.
> So, let's not confuse calls for transparency with suspicion of
> wrongdoing. Transparency should simply be the default, even if
> the persons acting are entirely trustworthy.
> Regards,
> Peda
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20141030/027cff00/attachment.html>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list