[Tagging] Deleting private objects in private spaces

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 10:38:32 UTC 2015


2015-03-18 11:28 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com>:

> So theoretically, we shouldn't ban anything from being mapped (or almost
> anything). But practically, we don't want people being routed to the
> nearest toilet that is actually inside a power plant. How do we fix this?



if that toilet is tagged with amenity=toilets it is a tagging error and the
tag should be fixed or the object completely removed. The toilets tag is
for "toilet[s] open to the public".


If you find yourself inside an area that has "operator=Massachusetts
> Electric Company", then the router can safely assume you can access
> anything with the "private:" prefix and a "operator=Massachusetts Electric
> Company" tag.
>
>

not at all. You can't assume it.
Also that scheme would require really a lot of tags to be added because it
seems it doesn't rely on inheritance from encompassing objects.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150318/e483c100/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list