[Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

[Jo]

As far as I'm concerned these are 2 separate route relations. It doesn't
really matter passengers can remain seated. When something changes like the
ref number it's a different route for the organisers. I would expect it's
also shown differently on schedules.

Jo

2016-09-13 8:35 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang <miklcct at gmail.com>:

> On Friday 05 August 2016 02:15:35 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> > > 3. There is a service, due to operational reasons, identified by two
> > > different numbers. However, the two different numbers are used in
> > > different segment of the service, but in fact, they belongs to the same
> > > service (i.e. passengers can get a ticket and board the vehicle on the
> > > segment with the first number, and alight at the end of the segment
> with
> > > the second number without intermediate alighting or additional
> payment).
> > > This is the case with train route Z806/Z803 from Zhaoqing to Kowloon,
> > > where the number Z806 is used on the segment from Zhaoqing to
> Guangzhou,
> > > and Z803 is used on the segment from Guangzhou to Kowloon (i.e. it can
> be
> > > treated as a through service).
> >
> > I would make 2 relations. Would be nice to invent a way to say that z806
> > will always become z803 (link the relations), but I don't know if there
> is
> > already something in use for this
>
> Now I encounter a bus route like this:
>
> A scheduled departure first runs the route K58, but in the middle the
> route, it
> enters the bus terminus of the route K53, change the route display from
> K58 to
> K53 without unloading passengers (i.e. passengers can remain on board from
> the
> segment on route K58 to the segment on route K53), and runs the remaining
> journey on route K53. What's the proper way of mapping this route?
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Sent from KMail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160913/14e12d4a/attachment-0001.html>