[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)
allan at mustard.net
Thu Nov 1 17:47:58 UTC 2018
I would envision it including the state-level representations plus the
various non-diplomatic "liaison offices" and "institutes" (e.g.,
American Institute in Taiwan) that are pseudo-embassies and in many
cases lack both diplomatic status and immunities. So
diplomatic_representation would probably be a bridge too far.
On 11/1/2018 10:16 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>> On 1. Nov 2018, at 17:57, Allan Mustard <allan at mustard.net> wrote:
>> How about amenity=embassy, amenity=consulate, plus amenity=representation to capture those facilities that are neither pudding nor frozen, er, sorry, neither embassies nor consulates? Any heartburn there? Then we use diplomatic=* as an additional tag (i.e., continue current practice) to specify different flavors, er, types of diplomatic/consular mission? Should I modify the proposed feature to that?
> +1, maybe “representation” could become “diplomatic_representation” or would that be incorrect for some of them? I see it is unwieldy, but “representation” alone can mean a link of things, so I would suggest to be more verbose.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging