[Tagging] routes with double use hiking and bicycle

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Sun Sep 2 12:53:45 UTC 2018

In public transport:

1 (one) route_master relation for the line

1 or more (typically 2) route relations for the variations in itinerary.


Op zo 2 sep. 2018 om 13:59 schreef Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:

> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>> You are inverting how route_master relations are used in public
>> transport. There the route master represents a line, and our route
>> relations represent the itineraries (all the variations).
> Variant 1: you can walk.
> Variant 2: you can cycle.
> I don't see how that differs significantly from variant 1 = "A B C D" and
> variant 2 = "A B D."  They are all ways of getting from A to D.
> To put it another way, how would you handle a bus route with two operators
> who use different service numbers and names for the same route?
> Creative abuse of the rules is fun.  Ask any company using tax avoidance
> schemes, like Google, Apple, etc.
> --
> Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180902/3ff2bcdf/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list