[Tagging] Artists studios, WAS Re: Keys to which new values can be added without a proposal: craft=, shop=, building=, office=, sport=?
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Aug 16 02:14:49 UTC 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Tagging] Artists studios, WAS Re: Keys to which new values can be added without a proposal: craft=, shop=, building=, office=, sport=?
- Next message (by thread): [Tagging] Artists studios, WAS Re: Keys to which new values can be added without a proposal: craft=, shop=, building=, office=, sport=?
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 16/08/19 12:03, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> What is the objective difference between the workshop of a sculptor
> who makes many copies of ancient or tradition sculptures out of stone
> by hand, versus the workshop of a “fine art” sculpture who sells
> expensive “original”’works?
None.
>
> There are many traditional sculptors in Indonesia who make stone
> Buddha statues (similar to those at Borobudur temple), or statues of
> Garuda carved intricately from wood or stone. Are they artists or not?
> They are certainly “sculptors”, no?
>
> Similarly, the art studio of a potter who makes expensive “fine art”
> pottery pieces will look similar to the studio of a craftsman who
> produces decorative ceramics by hand.
>
> I believe using a different key for “fine art painters” versus “craft
> and decorative painters” would be like using a different tag for
> regular restaurants and “fine cuisine” restaurants.
>
> The craft key is already being used for artistic sculptors, potters,
> glass makers, photographers and so on. It seems the most appropriate
> of the existing keys, and it would be inappropriately to try to divide
> “craft artists” and “fine artists” into different values, let alone
> different keys.
Some artists can copy, some cannot copy. It is a skill. Many who copy
can also originate.
>
> -Joseph
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:37 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 16. Aug 2019, at 02:27, Clifford Snow
> <clifford at snowandsnow.us <mailto:clifford at snowandsnow.us>> wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest we move artist from the craft discussion on to
> its own thread.
>
>
> agreed. Artists merit their own key, putting them under craft
> doesn’t seem like a good choice.
>
Artist do not merit their own key.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190816/c0fa9955/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Tagging] Artists studios, WAS Re: Keys to which new values can be added without a proposal: craft=, shop=, building=, office=, sport=?
- Next message (by thread): [Tagging] Artists studios, WAS Re: Keys to which new values can be added without a proposal: craft=, shop=, building=, office=, sport=?
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Tagging
mailing list