[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Tobias Wrede]

Am 14.02.2019 um 22:10 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
> I am sorry, this is not the correct approach. We have here plenty of 
> streets in other categories (unclassified|teritery|secondary|primary) 
> without sidewalk where it is perfectly legal for pedestrians to use 
> the road. This does not say whether it's safe to walk on them. If 
> people now start putting foot=no because they want to prevent people 
> from walking on the these roads because it's unsafe, then we create a 
> nice mess. You should map the deviation from the default (foot=no), 
> not confirm a default (foot=yes).
>
Agreed. I don't see much of a difference between residential and higher 
class roads. I would even argue that around here a sidewalk=no + foot=no 
is even less likely on higher class roads than on residentials.


> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 21:50, Tobias Zwick <osm at westnordost.de 
> <mailto:osm at westnordost.de>> wrote:
>
>     No, I didn't. I explained the quest here:
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-February/042860.html
>
>     In a nutshell: foot=yes/no is only asked if sidewalk=no is tagged.
>
ok. I somehow mixed that up.


Tobias

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190214/b14e490e/attachment.html>