[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*
lrichert at posteo.de
Sun Nov 15 01:43:44 UTC 2020
I was actually thinking of the type of battery, i.e. flywheel, LiOn,
etc. Although it would probably also be interesting to figure out a
tagging scheme to classify batteries by type, capacity etc. for the
future. And it's true that :grid, :generator, and :battery as second
namespaces are redundant if the source keys can be restricted to only
being usable if the corresponding infrastructure key is used.
The only issue I see with separating the tagging like this if the
general source of electricity is advertised (e.g. 'renewable' in a
supermarket and you can't determine if that's because they're connected
to the grid or they have a small wind turbine out back..rather unlikely
but still). I think that it's likely easy to tell or would also be
advertised if they had a local generator. Or perhaps would then have to
be left untagged.
If you'd like to add such a table to the wiki, feel free! :)
On 15.11.20 01:49, François Lacombe wrote:
> Le sam. 14 nov. 2020 à 21:00, Lukas Richert <lrichert at posteo.net
> <mailto:lrichert at posteo.net>> a écrit :
> Hi François,
> I do actually like the word input for generator and have been
> thinking that 'battery:origin' makes no sense either to specify
> the type of origin. Keys such as 'electricity:grid:origin=*',
> 'electricity:generator:input=*', and 'electricity:battery:type=*'
> would be more distinct and would separate them. My only problem
> with that is that the wikipage would probably need a flowchart to
> explain the tagging :/ What do you think?
> That's an interesting point.
> Do you mean electricity:battery:type should refer to the source of
> electricity that feeds the battery?
> Let's keep in mind that batteries are probably charged with the same
> electricity used in place.
> It won't change anything regarding origin or local supply source
> quality (electricity won't become greener).
> I think electricity:origin is enough, no need to add :grid inside but
> only restrict its usage with electricity:grid=yes, for sake of simplicity.
> With a simpler origin definition, a table would be enough.
> A table similar to Infrastructure table could be completed to give the
> applicable tagging suitable for each Infrastructure situation
> Let me know how do you feel and I could try to propose something for
> this table
> All the best
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging