[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -mass rock
pla16021 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 2 12:53:12 UTC 2021
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 at 13:30, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> to clarify:
> I am 100% fine with tagging existing and visible remains/ruins
So you won't have a problem with tagging a mass rock. Which tags get
used are open to discussion, but even you have to agree that if the
rock is still there, it can be mapped.
> I am not accepting mapping things of completely and utterly
> gone, without any trace whatsoever - and without danger of
> accidental remapping.
The rocks are still there. And can be mapped as natural=rock
(or bare_rock or whatever). Plus some other tags.
Actually, a rock doesn't have to have been used for masses to be
sacred. And it may still be in use. And it's mappable.
If we come up with a sensible set of tags for holy rocks, I'll
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging