[Tagging] Changing proposal process rules - RFC

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Jan 9 08:27:54 UTC 2021




Jan 9, 2021, 03:29 by graemefitz1 at gmail.com:

>
>
> Sorry, thought I had sent this yesterday but still sitting here
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 19:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>> It would mean that if some bad idea was introduced just before vote noone would be allowed
>> to mention it in their vote.
>>
>
> Don't really think that would be an issue?
>
> Let's say I've introduced a Proposal, put it to RFC, & spent 2 weeks answering everybody's comments & incorporating suggestions, so everybody is happy.
>
> I then say it's going to Voting, but as part of the update to change the status, I also amend the proposal to add 6 other features, completely change the definitions & so on.
>
> All that that is going to achieve is that everybody is going to quite correctly vote No, on the grounds that the proposal has been changed, & I've then wasted a few weeks time & effort :-(
>
I was responding to idea of restricting "no" votes to only reasons raised in RfC.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210109/81c21c33/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list