[Tagging] Is tag leisure=sports_hall suitable for riding halls?

Hufkratzer hufkratzer at gmail.com
Tue Jun 8 14:23:50 UTC 2021


07.06.2021 14:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging:
>
>
>
> Jun 7, 2021, 11:43 by hufkratzer at gmail.com:
>
>     On 07.06.2021 11:10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>         sent from a phone
>
>             On 7 Jun 2021, at 10:40, Robin Burek<robin.burek at gmx.de>
>             wrote:
>
>             It is also about saying that "leisure=pitch +
>             sport=equestrian + building=*" is deprecated.' and so on....
>
>         this combination seems invalid rather than deprecated. A pitch
>         cannot be a building, there might be a pitch in a building,
>         but they cannot be tagged on the same object
>
>         Cheers Martin
>
>
>     Then how would you map the examples that I mentioned initially
>     where the building has nearly the same size as the riding arena:
>     1. building=tent
>     (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Equitent_textile_Reithalle.jpg)
>     2. building=roof (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjVCeE-4Ht0)
>     I assume one should not draw two areas of the same size one on top
>     of the other. A node for the pitch although the dimensions are known?
>
> a) node for pitch
>
> b) smaller area for pitch than for building (it is smaller than 
> building, right?)
>
> c) actually tagging both on one object, it is poor idea but not worse 
> than popular
> merging of shop and building into one OSM object
>

The wiki page for key:shop has no "How to map" section, but the page for 
shop=mall has one, and it says that a shopping mall can have the tag 
building=retail. If a shopping mall can be a building why can't another 
shop be a building? This is not so clear to me. But I have to agree that 
a pitch can never be a building, it can only be in a building or under a 
roof. So I rather disagree and think that leisure=pitch + building=* on 
one object is worse than shop=* and building=* on one object and should 
not be recommended. OTOH the wiki page "One feature, one OSM element" 
says "If the building has a clear primary feature [...], the primary 
feature can be tagged on the building itself [...]". So is it allowed 
nevertheless? What do you think?


> d) resuse way with multipolygons (an excellent way to confuse mappers, 
> likely
> the worst one)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


And what about the first discussed solution: Draw one area on top of the 
other (overlapping ways reusing the same nodes)? It's easier to do than 
b) and d), unless a) gives information about the sizes and makes more 
sense that c). Can we remommend that?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210608/09abed7b/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list